{"id":936,"date":"2022-01-28T10:57:25","date_gmt":"2022-01-28T10:57:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/?p=936"},"modified":"2024-07-31T12:17:27","modified_gmt":"2024-07-31T11:17:27","slug":"using-work-as-an-inspiration-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/2022\/01\/28\/using-work-as-an-inspiration-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Using work as an inspiration &#8211; 2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-large-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Cariou v. Prince, 2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cariou v. Prince is a copyright case in the <strong>United States<\/strong> on whether Richard Prince&#8217;s appropriation of art treatment of Patrick Cariou&#8217;s photograph was a copyright infringement or fair use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><strong>Please note that the judgment falls under a legal jurisdiction other than the UK.<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prince copied several of Cariou&#8217;s original photographs and engaged in various transformations, including printing them, increasing their size, blurring or sharpening, adding content (sometimes in colour), and sometimes compositing multiple photographs together or with other works.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"257\" height=\"188\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2056\/2022\/01\/Cariou-v.-Prince-2013.jpg\" alt=\"Cariou's original black and white photograph of a Rastafarian man standing on greenery is juxtaposed to the Prince's creation where the same man has some face features coloured in blue and holds an electric guitar that is also coloured blue\" class=\"wp-image-939\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What do you think was the judgement? <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><code><div class=\"h5p-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe id=\"h5p-iframe-5\" class=\"h5p-iframe\" data-content-id=\"5\" style=\"height:1px\" src=\"about:blank\" frameBorder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"What do you think was the judgement for Cariou v. Prince?\"><\/iframe><\/div><\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Continue to read the article on <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cariou_v._Prince\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">this page on Wikipedia<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:9px\">The author takes no responsibility for the content of this page, which is not intended as binding legal advice. The views are about copyright in the UK Higher Education sector context.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cariou v. Prince, 2013 Cariou v. Prince is a copyright case in the United States on whether Richard Prince&#8217;s appropriation of art treatment of Patrick Cariou&#8217;s photograph was a copyright infringement or fair use. Please note that the judgment falls under a legal jurisdiction other than the UK. Prince copied several of Cariou&#8217;s original photographs [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":140,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[168],"tags":[170,167,92,71,169,171],"class_list":["post-936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-quiz","tag-art","tag-courts-judgement","tag-fair-use","tag-jurisdiction","tag-photography","tag-quiz"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/140"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=936"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/936\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1413,"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/936\/revisions\/1413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.coventry.domains\/copyrightliteracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}