REFLECTION TO MY 2ND SEMESTER FEEDBACKS:

Description

In this semester of healthcare management, I worked on diverse assignments like proposing changes, exploring critical thinking, and evaluating health systems. For the Proposal for Change, I chose a case study to meet specific learning goals. In another assignment about critical thinking, I learned to discuss ideas better but got feedback to improve how I structure my writing. Lastly, in the portfolio submission, I showed my understanding of complex health systems and used management tools. The feedback suggested improving how I write critically. Overall, this semester taught me a lot, and I plan to use the feedback to do even better in the future.

Feeling

I feel a sense of accomplishment and growth. Navigating through assignments on proposal development, critical thinking, and system evaluation, I gained a deeper understanding of healthcare complexities. The positive feedback on my strengths in conceptual discussion and case study selection is empowering, yet there’s a recognition of areas for improvement, particularly in structuring my writing more effectively. As I absorb these insights, there’s a genuine eagerness to apply constructive feedback in future assignments, fostering a commitment to continuous learning and improvement.

Evaluation

I am doing well in my healthcare management coursework. I am good at understanding and analyzing key concepts, solving problems, and using management tools effectively. The feedback says my assignments are nicely written with a clear flow, but there are some areas to work on. I need to avoid just describing things and be more critical in my writing, using evidence from what I have learned. It’s also suggested that I could include more real-life examples to make my points stronger. The feedback shows chances for me to get even better by digging deeper into topics, considering different perspectives, and organizing my arguments better. There’s a warning about being careful with referencing to avoid mistakes and keep things honest. Overall, it’s a positive review with some specific areas to focus on for improvement.

Action plan

I have learned a lot in my healthcare management studies during the third semester. I worked on different assignments, like suggesting changes, thinking critically, and understanding health systems. For one assignment, I chose a real-life example to help me learn better. Another task on critical thinking got me good feedback, but I need to work on how I write things. The feedback says I should use more real-life examples and be more careful with how I reference them. Overall, I feel good about what I have learned, and I am excited to use the feedback to do even better next time. I plan to practice writing better, find more real-life examples, and be more careful with my references.

Conclusion

In my second semester of healthcare management, I worked on different assignments like proposing changes and understanding health systems. I learned a lot and got good feedback, especially about using real-life examples and improving my writing. I plan to practice writing more, find more examples from real life, and be careful with how I reference.

SWOT ANALYSIS:

Strengths:

1. Knowledgeable and Critical Analysis is evident in the ability to discuss key concepts, evaluate problems, and propose solutions.

2. Effective Use of Management Tools in the Strategic Planning in Healthcare coursework, to identify root causes and develop potential solutions.

3. Clarity and Logical Flow in Writing: Feedback consistently notes well-written and coherent assignments with a logical flow. This indicates strong communication skills in presenting ideas and arguments.

4. Appropriate Referencing in most cases, there is a good attempt at referencing, with accurate use of referencing style. This reflects academic integrity and proper acknowledgment of sources.

Weaknesses:

1. Descriptive writing in certain assignments, there is feedback suggesting that responses were largely descriptive and could have been more critical. There’s a recommendation to enhance critical writing skills and use evidence from literature to support arguments.

2. Limited Use of Examples in Writing. The critical analysis is more beneficial from the usage of the good and real-time examples

Opportunities:

1. Enhance Critical Analysis has the opportunity to further enhance critical analysis skills by delving deeper into topics, exploring different perspectives, and evaluating multiple sources to inform her arguments.

2. Improved Structure and Clarity can enhance clarity and ensure that her arguments are presented in a more organized and cohesive manner.

Threats:

1. Risk of Repetitive Descriptive Writing may impact the overall quality of analysis and limit the depth of understanding.

2. There is a need to remain vigilant about referencing errors to maintain academic integrity and avoid potential issues related to citation.

This website was created using Coventry.Domains, a service of the Coventry University Group. The information, views, opinions and discussion contained on this website are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Coventry University Group. For more information on privacy, cookies, takedown requests and more, visit our policies page.